Search

Titanium Component Inspection Methods and Standards

Inspection methods for titanium components including NDT techniques CMM inspection and surface measurement.

tolerances
Cited (no URL)
Source: AS9100D ASME Y14.5
PropertyValueUnitNotes
CMM Accuracy±0.001mmZeiss-class CMM
Bore Gauge Accuracy±0.002mm
Dye Penetrant Detection>1mm surface crackASTM E1417
Ultrasonic Detection>0.5mm subsurfaceASTM E2375
Eddy Current Detection>0.1mm surface crackASTM E3097
X-Ray Detection>1% porosityASTM E1742

Dimensional Inspection

Method Accuracy Application
CMM (Zeiss) ±0.001 mm All dimensions, GD&T
Optical Comparator ±0.010 mm 2D profiles, thread forms
Laser Scanner ±0.020 mm Organic shapes, reverse engineering
Bore Gauges ±0.002 mm Hole diameter verification

Non-Destructive Testing

Method Detection Capability Standard
Dye Penetrant Surface cracks > 1 mm ASTM E1417
Ultrasonic Subsurface > 0.5 mm ASTM E2375
X-Ray Internal porosity > 1% ASTM E1742
Eddy Current Surface cracks > 0.1 mm ASTM E3097

Evidence Basis

Based on AS9100D quality-system requirements and ASME Y14.5 dimensioning/tolerancing, plus NDT standards ASTM E1417 / E2375 / E1742 / E3097. Method accuracies and detection limits are typical instrument capabilities.

Engineering Interpretation (titanium.blog)

(titanium.blog) Match the inspection method to the defect type and criticality: eddy current finds fine surface cracks (0.1 mm), ultrasonic finds subsurface flaws (0.5 mm), and dye penetrant finds surface cracks above 1 mm. CMM is the dimensional authority for GD&T; pair it with process control for titanium’s springback tendency.